So a little comic relief from an anonymous commenter. I've seen this guy before in cyberspace. He's been leaving similar comments in the Reader's Comments section of the on-line news reports covering Judge Hinson.
As he always does, he writes:
Could it be you are p****** off at Judge Hinson because he keeps ruling against you in your frivilous [sic] attempt to extort money from innocent people? You did it in PV and California and God only knows where else. Why don't you put your name on your post, D___? You and N___ are nothing but a couple of gypsy scam artists. You will never win. I know you won't post this for the public to see, but that is okay with me.He could have saved himself a lot of time if he had read my complaint in full, with footnotes in the PDF version. There, on page 5, footnote 5, I plainly say I've never been a litigant in Judge Hinson's court. This is an attested fact, since the form to file a complaint of judicial misconduct requires you to state whether you've had a case before the judge.
Then there's the "logic" of the paranoid mind. If you're going to conclude that the 'reason' (no pun intended) someone would file a complaint of judicial misconduct against a judge is because they must be peeved at the judge, then you must similarly conclude that the reason the Commission upheld a complaint is because members of the Commission are similarly peeved at the judge.
It must be a conspiracy. Yeah, that's the ticket. The members of the Commission and I conspired to get Judge Hinson. Do you like the way he admitted to our charges against him in the end? That's our secret mind control ray gun in action.
You don't suppose the fact could simply be that Judge Hinson broke the law, was caught, and is now paying (part of) the price?
Nawww... facts only matter to the rational. The paranoid delusional live in their own dark little world.
I titled this "A Funny Comment." But truly, I feel bad for these people.
No comments:
Post a Comment